Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carla Marie Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 11:29, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carla Marie Williams

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

seems to fail WP:GNG. Article is in fact a large coat rack and is hardly about the artist. No credits of her own. The Banner talk 20:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Banner. I've re-read the post with your points in mind, I have made edits to make it explicit that she is primarily a songwriter. RE: 'not talking about the artist', how do you suggest I make this more explicit, as I feel the whole article is written about her and she makes up the majority of the content? David r adams1 (talk) 11:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Banner. Could you please remove the flag unless you still have questions or deem the article innapropriate, please respond. Thanks David r adams1 (talk) 11:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, you just made one small cosmetic change without fixing the issues stated in the nomination. It is a long list of nice names with inappropriate external links in plain text, inappropriate sources (YouTube) and no info about ms. Williams and the tiny bit that is there is unsourced. Her singing career is with bands, not on her own account. Her writing edits are for co-writing, nothing on her own account and completely unsourced.

And you should not removed the AfD-template until after closure of this procedure, although usually this is done by the closer (not me). The Banner talk 12:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Pishcal — ♣ 22:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Pishcal — ♣ 22:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Pishcal — ♣ 22:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete What might otherwise appear to constitute notability, namely composing top ten songs, is really an illusion. She works for Xenomania which is the production company that produced those songs. No real basis for a claim to notability. --Bejnar (talk) 03:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are a lot of claims in that article, but I couldn't source most of them. Assuming they were culled, what would be left is a situation where neither WP:CREATIVE nor WP:GNG are met. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comments. She appears to be more of a producer, and if so, we usually delete such articles per WP:MILL. Songwriters are "it depends". Is there any way to source this article better? Also, can we userfy it? Bearian (talk) 19:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to have been a one shot deal by single-purpose account David r adams1, who has not answered about better sourcing at Talk:Carla Marie Williams, nor seem to have edited since 22 April. She is not a producer, she works for one. --Bejnar (talk) 01:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unless the claims are actually sourced, they should be removed, as per WP:VERIFY. Once they are, they clearly fail WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.