Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Courtney Joyner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

C. Courtney Joyner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This author has seen local interest but there are no reliable sources describing his career or his books. The author has not won awards or otherwise become notable.The books have not been bestsellers nor have they won awards. Binksternet (talk) 01:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I was actually fully expecting to find zero sources for this guy, but I did find some stuff out there. He's had more than a few of his audio commentaries get special notice and as a scriptwriter he's been singled out for notice in reviews as well. It's not the strongest sourcing out there, but it shows that his work is notable enough for him to pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:17, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, multiple references and publications on this person. Major contributor to the western and horror genres. I could go on and on. Somewhat puzzling as to why this gets a deletion nomination. (Boss Reality (talk) 09:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Note: I've struck this comment, as this is a sockpuppet of Electromechanic. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:20, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment At Tokyogirl79's request leaving this open. I've deleted others by this sock which hadn't had significant edits by anyone else but this one obviously has. Dougweller (talk) 07:48, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:23, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:36, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak/Delete I am not an expert of this subject, but, this person does at least to seem notable. Notable enough for a personal bio/article? I don't think so, but I think some information could be added to a few projects he seems to have been involved in. Orasis (talk) 08:04, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.