Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business and employment co-operative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be draftified via WP:REFUND. Sandstein 09:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Business and employment co-operative

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references in over a decade, and it is full of biased content. I tried salvaging it, but I think deletion is a better option. King of Scorpions 17:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. King of Scorpions 17:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify - the subject itself meets notability requirements. A simple WP:BEFORE] yields plenty of references and BECs are well understood and clearly notable. However the nominator is not putting this for deletion because of notability concerns, but because of the state of the article. Deletion is not for cleanup and I would normally suggest tagging it and trying to find a wiki project to attach it to. Although that second option is available, the article itself has been tagged regarding lack of citations since 2009 so tagging did not help. Wikipedia may have no deadlines, but 11 years without citations suggests this needs to be in draft until someone feels the issue is important enough to develop. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 19:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.