Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Building (Brian Larsen album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No WP:RS. There was no discussion of the proposed redirect, so I'm not going to include that in the consensus, but somebody else can be WP:BOLD and create it if they want. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Building (Brian Larsen album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Am I missing something here? YouTube and Twitter are nowhere near suitable for assessing GNG, and a WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing else. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:56, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 18:10, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I ran a couple of news searches and came up empty; page gives no indication of notability beyond the fact that artist is bluelinked. appears to have been created as PROMO shortly before album came out.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:17, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added a few sources related to the album and am happy to continue contributing to the page, but believe it is worth keeping. Will blue link the album via the crew's respective wiki pages as well. The album itself has notable contributors, so A9 does not apply. Mix Tape Queen (talk) 05:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You added a source that goes to a "Page not found" page, and an interview--a primary source. That in no way, shape or form satisfies notability requirements.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slick, just fyi, interviews in WP:RS do support notability; there's a world of difference between an interview or Q&A conducted by a journalist and published in Vanity Fair or the Chicago Tribune, and the sort of "interview" just used to "source" this page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well E.M.Gregory this interview has a three-sentence intro and a brief Q&A. An interview is a primary source, no matter who publishes it. My (and Wikipedia's) standards for a quality source are a bit higher than that. But you won't find me sighing about it.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mix Tape Queen, I urge you to familiarize yourself WP:RS. The "sources" you added (youtube, non-notable blogs) are not reliable. The page now has 5 "references", none of which is a RS. Notable contributors do not make an album notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There seems to be an insufficient amount of coverage from independent sources on this album, citing WP:NOTE. Not much else worth saying that hasn't already been said. Waterco4 (talk) 15:44, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Brian Larsen, agree with the delete !votes above that this is not notable. J04n(talk page) 12:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.