Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Herrera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Herrera

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to be notable. Only one source in the article is to a reliable source publication, but it's labeled as "opinion/commentary" and it's all that I see through a search. Otherwise, it's mostly cited to his YouTube channel. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Texas. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. He lives in Texas where gun ownership is the norm. This article seems to be promoting his YouTube channel that focuses on weaponry. He's announced he'll run for office in the future - sometimes people throw their hat in the ring to promote themselves. No indication he has a political base, or even a political platform except himself. Nothing out of the ordinary here. — Maile (talk) 14:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Have you not read his campaign website, which I believe is listed in the sources from my memory. https://brandonherreraforcongress.com/issues He lists quite a lot Los Pobre (talk) 17:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
His campaign site is WP:ABOUTSELF and does not contribute to WP:GNG because it is not independent of the subject. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable enough for an article. It's just promoting his YouTube channel. ThatOneWolf ^{(talk|contribs)} 22:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I'm not finding enough to meet WP:GNG (and he fails WP:NPOL). Other than what's currently in the article I found an article on MLK assassination conspiracy stuff he's into and an endorsement for his campaign from Kyle Rittenhouse. Neither of which is GNG coverage. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 18:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I had not found that Independent source, but that's significant coverage of Rittenhouse that touches on Herrera, rather than significant coverage of Herrera. "The Western Journal" is part of the Western Center for Journalism, which was founded by the founder of WorldNetDaily, so I question its reliability. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:44, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good to know on "The Western Journal". I skimmed the article and the tone seemed off and to entertain his conspiracy-ing too much, that explains why. I initially suspected it was just poor writing from a local or county paper, but it appears it's just a bad source. Thanks for letting me know. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 17:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.