Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Label Records (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Label Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletyed in 2007, this version has "referenciness" based on blogs and press releases, but nothing indicating it passes actual notability and sourcing guidance. Guy (Help!) 14:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, not seeing third-party significant coverage. Neutrality^talk 16:13, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A record label is considered notable if and when it's the subject of coverage in reliable sources — it is not granted a presumption of notability if the sourcing is piled almost entirely on blogs, press releases, user discussion forums and Soundcloud or Beatport profiles. The same user also created an article about Tony Sour (the label founder) at the same time, which was deleted a month ago per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Sour as not properly substantiating notability per WP:NMUSIC either. Bearcat (talk) 23:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- no indications of notability and I'm only seeing trivial mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.