Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhargav Narasimhan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bhargav Narasimhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Narasimhan's cubing results, if notable enough, would allow pages for hundreds of cubers. Guinness World Records should not satisfy GNG for cubers, as Guinness is not the authority, World Cube Association is. Consider, for example, the one-handed single solve world record: http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/fastest-average-time-to-solve-a-rubiks-cube-one-handed/, which has in fact been broken 6 times since in official competitions: https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/results/regions.php?eventId=333oh&history=History Notice that Bhargav Narasimhan's record is the obscure record of 5 consecutive one-handed solves. Narasimhan's first media appearance is the highlights of day 2 of some event, and the second is about the Guiness record.Tkwikihelper (talk) 23:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.