Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhaergala
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. JGHowes talk 02:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bhaergala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Badly sourced stub about little-known Dungeons & Dragons monster. Fails WP:GNG. Not a very active user (talk) 04:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 04:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 04:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 04:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Without sources to establish notability, this does not need an article. TTN (talk) 11:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep or merge to Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 14:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, not enough real world notability, fails WP:GNG. Would say redirect to the list suggested by BOZ, but it looks like that list might not survive it's own AfD.Onel5969 TT me 11:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per onel5969.4meter4 (talk) 18:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Extremely minor, non-notable D&D monster. There are no reliable, secondary sourced discussing this in any way that support notability. Rorshacma (talk) 00:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.