Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bengal-class strike carrier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bengal-class strike carrier

Adding after AfD has had several comments - This was my oversight, and I don't think they're all that different from the articles listed above. Please feel free to ~~strike out~~ this addition if you object to it. --EEMIV (talk) 20:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary for classes of ships. The ship classes as a whole don't play a notable role in the video games, let alone the real world. No sources to substantiate development, critical response, or any other real-world impact. --EEMIV (talk) 15:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unverifiable. PouponOnToast (talk) 15:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
strong delete per nom. ~~Note to admin: Dont forget to delete the category if this results in delete.~~ RogueNinja_talk 16:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not all of the ships in Category:Wing Commander spacecraft have been nominated -- just the capital ships. Starfighters are next, and from there specific, name ships. --EEMIV (talk) 16:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - My bad. I was going to do this before, and I thought these were all the ships. RogueNinja_talk 17:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete - Totally not notable unless their can be an establishment of notability. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please note the result of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kilrathi_Heavy_Destroyer RogueNinja_talk 18:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A lot of work went into these, but sad to say they fall well short of WP:NOTE. RMHED (talk) 19:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 13:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all and a commendation to the nominator for this bold initiative. These articles all fail WP:NOT#GUIDE and their heavy in universe perspective fails WP:WAF. There are no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate real-world notability of these fictional craft outside of the Wing Commander cannon. This type of fancruft which has no real-world information falls outside the scope of Wikipedia, and is covered elsewhere on Wingcommnder fansites. --Gavin Collins (talk) 13:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. Percy Snoodle (talk) 13:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another 14:12, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all the above. This is non-notable fiction. -- Mikeblas (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.