Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bekaaboo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neither of the keep comments give any policy-based reasons to keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bekaaboo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously speedy deleted as G11. It looks as if the content has been improved a bit so it is less obviously promotional, but there is still a fundamental notability problem. Neither the sources in the article nor any others I can find are sufficiently reliable and independent - all coverage is clear PR blurb on industry websites. Hugsyrup (talk) 09:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Hugsyrup (talk) 09:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hugsyrup (talk) 09:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:49, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : I feel (and I might be wrong), that it should be kept and it might be too soon to delete this. It does have two cast members who are notable themselves. Of course, the tv series can not inherit their notability but still, I think the page about such tv series should be at an encyclopedia. Exploreandwrite (talk) 11:37, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : I feel (and I might be wrong) the page should not be deleted as it has all the necessary information required and it should be given explaination that why this page must not be on Wikipedia. Just because it was previously deleted doesn't qualify that this page should also be deleted.Noormohammed satya (talk)
Delete. The sources present are all paid press, press releases, or otherwise useless for determining notability. Neither Explore or Satya's !votes make any sense from a policy standpoint either. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^Bori! 20:36, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:40, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - While I believe the digital hash might scrape in, I don't think any of the sources given, or a couple of other actual reviews (vs reviews of the trailer) are of sufficient reliability/independence to qualify. I'd specifically like to note that Exploreandwrite's !vote seems to be WP:ILIKEIT. @Noormohammed: - could you clarify which particular sources demonstrate notability is established? WP:NTV is rather more vague than WP:NFILM, but reliable sources are viewed as important, and it seems somewhat similar to GNG. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:20, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.