Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Stadtlander

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Stadtlander

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came across this one after looking at another article and unfortunately despite the claims in this article, I wasn't able to find where this person is as notable as they would need to be in order to remain on Wikipedia. The current state of the article is different than what it originally looked like, but then I was trying pretty hard to cull any of the obituary-type prose and find some notability. Other than one or two brief mentions here and there, I can't really find where she's all that notable. She's mentioned in this link as a "leading trompe l'oeil artist", but I can find nothing else that mentions her in this light and we need more than one news article (that reads a lot like a press release) to really show that someone is actually a leading figure in something. There's a brief mention of her in a book about her stuff as far as a museum goes, but I can't tell if it was a permanent exhibition, a temporary one, or even if it's the same person at all. All I get is a brief snapshot of a page. Other than that we have the assertion of some awards, none of which I can really find a mention of outside of this page or outside of the primary source. I feel a little bad nominating both this page and the one for her grandson at the same time, but neither person seems to have any real notability here. If anyone can dig something up I'd be most obliged, but I don't really think there's notability here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I cannot find significant coverage. I tried looking for any coverage related to the two items identified as notable and turned up nothing. -- Whpq (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 06:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 07:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.