Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangla Tribune (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. qedk (t 桜 c) 13:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bangla Tribune

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I stand by my previous nomination. Unfortunately, Users did not show interest in commenting on the previous nomination (only a vague keep) despite being open for 15 days. I'm nominating the article again under the same rational. ~ Nahid ^Talk 14:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. ~ Nahid ^Talk 14:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ~ Nahid ^Talk 14:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ~ Nahid ^Talk 14:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The first nomination was closed as Keep on 2nd January 2020. Isn't it a bit too soon to open a second nomination for the same article? Za-ari-masen (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

well, if there is a policy, I'm not familiar about it in which case I can withdraw. But I believe, it was kept because of no consensus or low participation. So if there is no policy regarding the time-frame then given the nature of the previous closing it is perfectly fine. ~ Nahid ^Talk 21:06, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:31, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.