Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashworth Harold McGee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ashworth Harold McGee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a memorial page written by a family member. No evidence of notability beyond the local level. Kelly ^hi! 19:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable enough for a stand-alone Wikipedia article, based on WP:PEOPLE and WP:GNG. I agree with the nominator that it appears that this page was a memorial by a family member. As with any other evangelist, McGee did not lead people to salvation because he thought that it would bring him worldly fame, and it is fair to say that he has received an eternal recognition more important than getting a page during Wikipedia's brief existence in the beginning 1/3rd of the 21st century. Mandsford 21:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTE. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 21:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sadly, he hasn't achieved the notability he deserved. St Anselm (talk) 22:18, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO. Wikipedia isn't a memorial or the family photo album. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 20:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO, as non-notable. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 18:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.