Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Black (entrepreneur)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to FasciaBlaster. ✗plicit 12:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Black (entrepreneur)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Good marketing, nothing significant to cover her on Wikipedia. If her business is notable then create a separate article. Fails WP:GNG. Fhektii (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Engineering, Alabama, Georgia (U.S. state), and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ashley Black's FasciaBlaster: Non-notable individual, no coverage outside of lawsuits for the FasciaBlaster. No book reviews found, only where to buy them, so not passing AUTHOR. Redirect seems fine as notability is only around the Blaster product. Oaktree b (talk) 15:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to ~~Ashley Black's FasciaBlaster~~ FasciaBlaster, which appears to be a notable WP:PRODUCT. As to this article, there does not appear to be significant coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources about Black to support a separate standalone article; some of my efforts at verifying content and whether a 2005 news source is usable is further discussed at the article talk page, including a review of various promotional sources, including some that were removed several weeks before the nomination. Beccaynr (talk) 00:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)update comment to reflect renamed article Beccaynr (talk) 07:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Lacks separate notability from the FasciaBlaster. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.