Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art Lee (Taiko)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 01:47, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Art Lee (Taiko)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY; perhaps someone with better linguistic skills can prove me wrong. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years; time it was resolved — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boleyn (talk • contribs) 20:12, 30 March 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 02:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-Looking over he does seem to have some sort of notability. Wgolf (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as he appears notable (only Westerner to win the competition, etc.), though the article needs serious cleanup and refs to support some of the claims. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Personally, I can't find any sources to establish notability. If someone could prove me wrong with specific sources, I would be happy to change my position, but at this point, I say delete. If you do so, please ping me in your response. BenLinus 1214^talk 00:56, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.