Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcade Classic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Izno (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arcade Classic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page has only one source, Gamefaqs, which is unreliable. Even then, the article seems to lack any sort of notability whatsoever, and is really just composed of a couple sentences. Namcokid47 (talk) 22:50, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:18, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG. Notable arcade titles, but notability cannot be transferred to this particular series. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 06:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - Plenty of SIGCOV in RSes:

The Electric Playground - http://web.archive.org/web/19970804174137/www.elecplay.com/portable/ast-mis.html ; http://web.archive.org/web/19970804174044/www.elecplay.com/portable/cent-mil.html ; http://web.archive.org/web/19970804173859/www.elecplay.com/portable/galaxgal.html
Total! - http://total.bee-ware.ch/tests/gb/gb_Asteroids&MissileCommand.jpg
Full page review in GamePro - https://archive.org/stream/GamePro_Issue_074_September_1995#page/n85/mode/2up
Allgame - https://web.archive.org/web/20100215220945/http://www.allgame.com/game.php?id=18074&tab=review ; https://web.archive.org/web/20141211121553/http://www.allgame.com/game.php?id=7307&tab=review
EGM (archived here in .CBR format)
Series won the Game Players 1995 Holiday Edition (Vol. 8, No. 13) "Best Game Boy Game(s) of the Year"

And that's literally just what I found in like 10 minutes. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 20:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks. Those seem to be notable, so I'll withdraw it. Namcokid47 (talk) 20:40, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.