Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appy Pie (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. All "keep" opinions are by accounts with less than 100 edits, suggesting shenanigans. Sandstein 10:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appy Pie

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Classic spam, fails WP:NCORP. There's a ton of references, but most of them look like routine coverage, press releases, etc that don't meet WP:SIRS. The editing history is largely a sequence of throw-away WP:UPE accounts. It's not quite bad enough for WP:G11. There's a bunch of copyvios as seen in the earwig report, but not quite bad enough for WP:G12. In theory, I could cut them out, but it would leave a jumbled mess, and I can't see investing the effort to re-write this. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:21, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:26, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:26, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom and noted in the previous AFD (which was closed to DEL, btw - so I'm not sure how the article has somehow resurfaced(?) or has been recreated by throw-away accounts (?), the subject appears to fail WP:NCORP as almost of the sources are generated from either press releases, contributors (with no editorial integrity), and some are just outright 404. --Infogapp1 (talk) 19:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Interesting software but Fail WP:GNG.Charmk (talk) 04:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge - I think this article is notable, though I recognize it could be seen as spam, in which case a merge would be appropriate with AppMakr. I've found these articles (1 2) and the page can be updated accordingly. Vivekpegasus (talk) 08:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep currently there are a lot of citations easily passing WP:GNG could be a case of objections per nom but as per sources it passes GNG "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list."JK.Kite (talk) 07:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is still possible to improve the article in order to be more compliant to the editorial standards of Wikipedia if it is not, or at least to the editorial preferences of Wikipedia editors. The subject is notable and directly contributes to its field of subject, so deletion must only proceed if it is definitely impossible to improve the existing article. MacPoli1 (talk) 17:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC+8)
Delete - fails WP:NCORP Dr. Vetter (talk) 01:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is still improving and surely they will rectify there mistake and follow the policies 49.206.34.144 (talk) 11:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC) (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : Based on the edit history on the page, there are multiple socks trying to add content to the article. Fails notability for Corporations. Likely a scam. AngusMEOW (chatter • paw trail) 12:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.