Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antony Dundas
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Antony Dundas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to have had a fully professional career as a player, and I doubt the notability as referee--but I admit my unfamiliarity with this as an organized sport. DGG ( talk ) 19:40, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:35, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is no specific notability guideline (SNG) for darts players under WP:NSPORTS, and therefore the subject must meet the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG for inclusion in Wikipedia. Having reviewed the article, it contains only one source, an entry on a darts player database that cannot be used to establish notability. Per WP:GNG, I cannot find multiple published, non-trivial, secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 04:36, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:46, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no in depth coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:11, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.