Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony (web series)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:51, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Anthony (web series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Yuck, what a mess. It is pretty entirely cited to local sources, and I can't find anything outside of those sources. It's a YouTube sitcom, and no actor appears to be notable. The article has been orphaned since April 2013. I believe this fails WP:GNG very comfortably, due to the lack of coverage in non-local, reliable sources. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:50, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete can't find any sources or coverage online, article is also a complete mess. Adrianw9 (talk) 17:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. I can't find any reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Detete per same rationale. Don't see much room for potential improvement here, as only sources I'm able to find are local-based reports of questionable reliability. — MusikAnimal talk 18:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I love "bad" webseries, but this only has 568 views of the first episode[1], which confirms the sourcing is as questionable as it looks.--Milowent • hasspoken 03:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Good grief, I didn't expect it to be quite that low - three of my own videos have more views than that! Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.