Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annita McVeigh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Annita McVeigh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not met criteria of notability, per WP:CREATIVE. Two dubious references to articles written by the person, which however does not say anything about the person. No coverage about the person has been found; does not even have an entry on the BBC website. Mootros (talk) 02:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete After some Googling I cannot find any authoritative coverage of McVeigh.--A bit iffy (talk) 07:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a run-off the mill broadcaster, nothing notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Andrew³²⁷ 20:16, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 20:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.