Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annelise Coste

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Anne-Lise Coste. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Annelise Coste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails to meet relevant WP:WP:ARTIST as well basic WP:GNG. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Faizanalivarya: How did you accidentally created this BLP? How many Women in Red articles have you created or contributed to? Or perhaps you were paid to create this BLP? And also why are you suggesting this for deletion after I initiated the deletion process? If you have any COI please declare them. I have concerns about potential COIs across several pages where your involvement seems suspicious. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mr @Saqib your tone is very disrespectful and should be reported honestly you are being very unreasonable and being very personal, I dont want to say but you made me say it, the number of BLPs you have created are just one or two liners without much data or information. Please be respectful and without any valid prove how you may just pass your judgement that I have been involve in paid content, honestly admin should take action against its very very disrespectful how can you call someone is taking money to contribute. Very disrespectful. We are here to spend our time to contribute for continues improvement of wikipedia we create we remove. Very sad to see such statement from you. Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 10:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch! Due to the misspelled page name,I couldn't find much coverage. Lets proceed with a redirect. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 16:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.