Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annelise Coste
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Anne-Lise Coste. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Annelise Coste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails to meet relevant WP:WP:ARTIST as well basic WP:GNG. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have nominated to delete the article as this article was created accidently to support Wikipedia
- WP:WOMRED as author I Would like to request to remove the article. Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 09:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Faizanalivarya: How did you accidentally created this BLP? How many Women in Red articles have you created or contributed to? Or perhaps you were paid to create this BLP? And also why are you suggesting this for deletion after I initiated the deletion process? If you have any COI please declare them. I have concerns about potential COIs across several pages where your involvement seems suspicious. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Mr @Saqib your tone is very disrespectful and should be reported honestly you are being very unreasonable and being very personal, I dont want to say but you made me say it, the number of BLPs you have created are just one or two liners without much data or information. Please be respectful and without any valid prove how you may just pass your judgement that I have been involve in paid content, honestly admin should take action against its very very disrespectful how can you call someone is taking money to contribute. Very disrespectful. We are here to spend our time to contribute for continues improvement of wikipedia we create we remove. Very sad to see such statement from you. Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 10:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Faizanalivarya: How did you accidentally created this BLP? How many Women in Red articles have you created or contributed to? Or perhaps you were paid to create this BLP? And also why are you suggesting this for deletion after I initiated the deletion process? If you have any COI please declare them. I have concerns about potential COIs across several pages where your involvement seems suspicious. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, and Switzerland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - this article appears to be about the same person as this: Anne-Lise Coste, however the name is mis-spelled in the article currently up for deletion. I seriously doubt this version (Annelise Coste) was a paid UPE COI creation, just a mistake on the part of the creator. BTW, she is notable. Netherzone (talk) 13:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- It very likely is the same person, using the same New Yorker reference. We could speedy this as a duplicate article and be done with it. Oaktree b (talk) 15:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Good catch! Due to the misspelled page name,I couldn't find much coverage. Lets proceed with a redirect. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 16:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: New Yorker piece is fine as a reference, but it's a brief biography. She's in the Getty ULAN [1], but I don't see links to many external sources of documentation. Oaktree b (talk) 15:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Some mentions that she was one of the 4000 active French artists as per Artindex, but I don't see much beyond that. I don't think we have enough for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Oaktree b, you might want to have a look at Anne-Lise Coste and also the links I've provided below. All best, Netherzone (talk) 16:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Anne-Lise Coste - A proper WP:BEFORE search was not conducted before nominating, which is best-practices. Firstly, the article already exists at Anne-Lise Coste, secondly, she is indeed notable and clearly meets WP:NARTIST with works in the permanent collection of the Stedelijk Museum [2], Barcelona Museum of Contemporary Art [3], the FRAC des Pays de la Loire [4], the Von Schulthess Collection [5], the Sanders Collection [6] among others. And thirdly, she clearly meets WP:GNG per Artforum Magazine [7], and [8], New Yorker [9], Mousse Magazine [10],Artland Magazine [11], and [12][13], and many more. The accusations towards the creator are astonishing, please WP:AGF Saqib. This should be redirected to the correct target which is Anne-Lise Coste the correct spelling of her name. Netherzone (talk) 16:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect as suggested. Please read WP:BEFORE and WP:FORK. Bearian (talk) 17:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect and remove (delete) the article on Annelise Coste. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 17:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.