Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Pedrero-MacMillan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If she has managed to mostly stay out the media, then she will be mostly out of Wikipedia as well due to not meeting WP:GNG or other notability standards. RL0919 (talk) 01:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Pedrero-MacMillan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Notability is not inherited like wealth, and I am unable to find multiple reliable sources that discuss her in a significant way. ... discospinster _talk 20:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 20:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is fundamentally incorrect. The whole point (read the Forbes article) is that this family is incredibly secretive. Your inability to uncover their secrets does not make these billionaires unnotable. Hawerchuk (talk) 20:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Actually it does, according to Wikipedia criteria of notability. ... discospinster _talk 01:34, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No indication of individual notability. Simply being part of a family does not makeone notable. Lard Almighty (talk) 07:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

She was the chair of Cargill's investment arm, and is on the board of both that company and Cargill itself. Literally one of the most-powerful businesspeople in the country. And you think that's not notable? Hawerchuk (talk) 15:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a matter of what you or I think. It's a matter of whether she meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. She doesn't. Lard Almighty (talk) 15:37, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite from there what you view as the lack of notability. It is not obvious to me. Hawerchuk (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The nomination clearly states the issues. Lard Almighty (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:27, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not seeing notability and mostly primary or self published sources were used. Jooojay (talk) 01:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete she may have huge influence in a majr company, but that does not create notability. What is needed is showing this, which is lacking. None of her positions to date make her default notable, and we would need better sourcing to even suggest notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:56, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 12:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.