Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Fitch
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to New Belgium Brewing Company. The consensus was that this ought not be a discrete article, and the redirect is the most convenient way to preserve the attribution history. If necessary a history merge could be performed, but that does not seem to be warranted at this time. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:09, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Anne Fitch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested redirect. Fails WP:Bio. There are no reliable sources for this person. The person is not mentioned in any of the references given in the article. The article explains that the person is a neighbour of the brewery owner, and her sole claim to fame is that her designs are used by the brewery. WP:NOTINHERITED applies here. SilkTork *YES! 00:43, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I can see her being mentioned in an article on the brewery, but she doesn't meet WP:BIO. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 00:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Revert to redirect per WP:NOTINHERITED. I couldn't find any coverage about her in Google News Archive, so she lacks notability. If a merge to New Belgium Brewing Company#Label design, this redirect must be kept for GFDL attribution. If nothing has been merged, I would recommend an outright delete, since this is a very unlikely search term. Cunard (talk) 06:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 06:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO miserably. --Cybercobra (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.