Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Clare Brokaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Clare Boothe Luce. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:27, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Clare Brokaw

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

certainly a tragic death, but nothing indicates notability in her lifetime, if anything the notable bits attach to her mother, but notability is not inherited Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:10, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would support the calls to Merge to Clare Boothe Luce--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:14, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would say merge with her mother's page and redirect there. Her claim to significance is that her death affected her mother deeply and one result was the building of Saint Ann's Chapel in Palo Alto which was the center of the Stanford University Catholic community from its building until around 1970 when Stanford religious groups were allowed to hold services on campus (before then the only religious services had to be non-denominational in the Stanford Memorial Church); the chapel was eventually sold and is now a church for an Anglican splinter group. --Erp (talk) 02:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Clare Boothe Luce The cited content is interesting but it's not enough for general notability. A sentence or two could be merged into the article about the subject's mother. This should not standalone. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:19, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above. Blythwood (talk) 01:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 12:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or redirect somewhere. The whole content of the article strikes me as utterly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:57, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.