Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anandmurti Gurumaa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 14:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anandmurti Gurumaa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see zero reliable sources among the references to support how this person meets WP:BIO notability criteria. Most of them are primary sources or dead links. A Google search doesn't come up with much besides her Youtube and Facebook presense. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Appears to be a vanity page. If someone else comes up with RS for this person, I could be convinced to change my mind. Montanabw ^(talk) 09:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as by far expected of course as we've seen this before, but there's simply nothing, at least comprehensibly, better for any applicable notability. There's nothing actually salvageable here. SwisterTwister talk 07:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of independent sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.