Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Stebbins
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tim Song (talk) 16:36, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Amy Stebbins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nom - no claim to notability made. No sources. Previously speedied. Rklawton (talk) 17:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't see any reliable sources. Clubmarx (talk) 02:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I'm confused about whether she is the same person as Amy Stebbins, an opera singer, who has some reliable sourcing [1] [2]. The subject of this article is described as a theater director and critic, and is still a student. No sourcing turns up for that job description. But the theater-director-critic is said to have produced Duett, and the opera singer "concocted" Duett, which apparently means she wrote it. That suggests they are one and the same. If this is all one person there might be some claim of notability to be made, but the article as it stands does not justify that claim. --MelanieN (talk) 03:01, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sign of significant coverage. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 15:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.