Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Lynn Baxter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep Baxter, delete Ryan. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:23, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Lynn Baxter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seana Ryan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Like Tammy Chapman, these two receive very little in notability. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 07:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Baxter after reviewing the Google News and Google Books hits. I consider her notable under the GNG along with PORNBIO since she's been featured several times on the Howard Stern show. Article should be expanded with use of the sources that demonstrate her notability. As for Ryan, delete since I can't find the same.Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:26, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No substantial sourcing. Appears to be spam for the porn industry. Tommy1964 (talk) 20:57, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What's she actually done? Anything worth noting? Nothing there yet. Having a Wikipedia article seems to be a desirable thing when a career is flagging, but I can't see much evidence of a career having begun in this article. Peridon (talk) 23:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS The two other pets from that year that are blue-linked have at least something to show in their articles (that was not intended to be a funny..) - one has a Filmography section (but how notable the films are might be debatable elsewhere). Peridon (talk) 23:26, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note & Comment: - I updated the article reflecting some of free news sources from Google News. I believe editors should review outside available sources to determine notability rather than the one that was originally put in the article. This is not a game of gotcha. IMDB shows she has been in several movies but I can't gauge their notability. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:18, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I quote from the ref about the Playboy radio feature "As it turns out, Playboy didn't corral any New York personalities, unless you count Tempest and Amy Lynn Baxter, who are frequent visitors on the Howard Stern show and about whom the real question is whether they even own clothing." I've never seen the Stern programme, and having just read the article here can say that even if I had a TV I probably wouldn't watch it. I wonder if the girls were there for some deep intellectual discussion or just as decoration? The NYDN obviously doesn't regard them as anything of particular note. (I'm not sure who Tempest is - the NYDN refers to the 'Baxters' presumably indicating she is a sister of the subject here.) Peridon (talk) 17:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:36, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:42, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This is a very sloppy nomination. Article about Baxter in USA Today [1]. Article about Baxter in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch [2]. Numerous other citations in many newspapers, with 66 Google News hits. Former Penthouse Pet of the Month. Ravenswing 20:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I should amend my vote above as pertaining to Baxter; I have no opinion regarding Ryan. Ravenswing 18:31, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Baxter due to Morbid's edits. Dismas|^(talk) 20:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Baxter per Morbidthoughts and Ravenswing, and Keep Ryan per coverage meeting WP:GNG.[3][4]. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ravenswing. Ample RS interest to satisfy WP:GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.