Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amilton of Christ (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amilton of Christ

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for lack of significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Fails WP:NOTEBLP. The previous Afd was closed by a non-admin as no consensus with no comments received after the original nomination had stood open several weeks. --Bejnar (talk) 17:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —innotata 20:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —innotata 20:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. —innotata 20:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —innotata 20:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Does not have significant coverage from reliable independent sources. EricSerge (talk) 21:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I moved the article to his actual name Amilton de Cristo--the name used for the article seems to have been that of a machine translation. DGG ( talk ) 03:57, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 12:42, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- If he really has sold 1M+ books and holds two honorary degrees, I would expect him to be notable, but I do not know. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as Portuguese wikipedia deleted his article pt:Amilton_de_Cristo as non-notable in 2013, and they should be better able to assess his notability. Moreover the article Amilton de Cristo has been deleted before, and its authors blocked for sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AMILTON DE CRISTO. – Fayenatic London 21:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see no discussion of the article there. I give their judgment considerable credit, but not absolutely--the standards of different WP are not the same. We may, for example, be more--or less-- inclusive of unusual religious figures than they might be. I know the standards of some other WPs, but not the ptWP. DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.