Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Lexx (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Lexx

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Glamour model with brief porn career whose most significant achievement appears to be a single picture in Playboy. Fails WP:ENT, WP:PORNBIO, and the GNG. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits, no billed roles outside porn, and just one porn credit. No reliable sourcing; the article appears to be drawn entirely from a promotional bio. Survived an AFD five years ago before relevant notability guidelines were tightened up; these days, it's nearly a speedy candidate. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC) Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I had a look at the article and on the web and agree with nom. Fails WP:GNG. Also, WP:NOTPROMO. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 06:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:17, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.