Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allurez Jewelry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Allurez Jewelry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Cited sources mention Allurez in passing, or are listings of the company in fastest-growing lists, etc., but no evidence of any real, significant coverage. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete: Nothing notable about this one! References are written for promotions alone. Light2021 (talk) 16:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete by all means as blatant advertising information by what only the company would advertise itself, and the advertising-only account also emphasizes this alone; there's nothing at all to sensibly suggest an otherwise better article, literally. SwisterTwister talk 21:07, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.