Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia Prieto Langarica
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) JBL (talk) 11:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alicia Prieto Langarica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NPROF. scope_creepTalk 01:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Her publications have too low citations for WP:PROF#C1. But that is only one of multiple WP:PROF criteria, and does not have any priority over the others. She has won a notable and significant national-level award for distinguished teaching from one of the major scholarly mathematical societies (WP:PROF#C2), the award cites contributions that go beyond her own institution (WP:PROF#C4), and there is plenty of WP:GNG-type coverage of both her upbringing and her current work. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Passes NPROF as the winner of a significant award. Furius (talk) 10:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I should have checked. I couldn't decide if the award was notable. Nomination Withdrawn. scope_creepTalk 10:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.