Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrienne Outlaw
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Adrienne Outlaw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable person. Tyros1972 Talk 09:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Reviewed in Art in America and work praised by several other reliable sources. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:00, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Reviewed in Art in America Kabirat (talk) 10:27, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 00:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Easily meets Wikipedia:ARTIST with "4.The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." The article does need work but not deletion.--Canoe1967 (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete More references may help.--Benfold (talk) 06:19, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Artist's work has received coverage sufficient to establish notability. Aside from what has already been mentioned, a Google news search shows a lot of local coverage, but beyond that I also see articles behind pay walls in the Chicago Tribune and I found this item in the Daily Gazette of Schenectady NY. -- Whpq (talk) 17:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.