Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adherer (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adherer (Dungeons & Dragons)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. It is only supported by a single trivial listicle. Seems like both previous AfDs were multi-nomination messes. TTN (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All cruft and no substance nor notability. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 16:24, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Minor fictional creature, whose majority of sources appear to be from primary sources and licensed game books. The one short blurb in a "top ten" style list being used is not nearly enough coverage to pass the WP:GNG. There appears to be no further coverage of the creature in reliable, secondary sources. Rorshacma (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is no reason for Wikipedia to have articles on every possible character type in D&D.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lacks sufficient RS to pass the GNG. Chetsford (talk) 02:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.