Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Able Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 08:53, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Able Labs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:COMPANY. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: While noting the 2006 comment at Talk:Able_Labs#Removal of non-notable tag, the FDA action and the firm's consequent failure seem to me to fall short of the WP:EFFECT criteria. I can see various news items from The Record in Bergen County and some industry publications but these seem to me to be routine and local coverage. A 2008 case is also reported [1] but as application of an earlier judgment. I do not see the in-depth coverage needed for notability. AllyD (talk) 07:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Apparently there was no widespread scandal that resulted in this company being noteworthy even for that. No significant independent coverage of this company either positive or negative. And no coverage that would qualify for WP:CORPDEPTH. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 05:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.