Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Cloud Guru

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 21:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Cloud Guru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient evidence of notability . The item in the Sydney Morning Hrald isa promotional article where the founders talk about their own project, and therefore is not independent by the standards of WP:NCOPR. The article in the Austin Statesman is a notice of funding + a quote from the founder and thus is not reliable for RS. The article in the Australian ,which I cannot access, also seems from the visible information to be either a statement by the founder or based on a statement by the founder. checking Google News and even Google I find more of the same:announcement of finance, and promotional interviews or reprints of what seem to be identical promotional interviews. Theeare discussions on reddit and quora. DGG ( talk ) 22:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. DGG ( talk ) 22:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 01:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep on the basis of current coverage. It's a bit promotional, but it more talks about them than promotes I think. Can't seem to access the other articles owing to what appears to be a paywall, so if we can get some better coverage that'll strengthen it up I think. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:37, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.