Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AQA Holding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AQA Holding

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is about an holding but the article is contrary to Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). There are no sources. Furthermore the page is full of misinformation: subsidiaries list is wrong (those listed are Air Italy subsidiaries; AQA Holding exists just because has 100% of Air Italy's shares and nothing else), the history is about Air Italy and not about this company. AQA Holding should just be mentioned on Air Italy article and nothing more. Wind of freedom (talk) 02:40, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:49, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:49, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:49, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Wind of freedom the page has no relevance to the actual company and is more just information about Air Italy which already has its own page and all the information is already there. The user who created the page states they want to make the page "similar to the LATAM Group wiki page" which is completely impossible as they are two different scale companies. CBG17 (talk) 20:55, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment CBG17 Perhaps you could clarify if you're voting or commenting because your contribution might be intended as a !vote but may not be counted. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indications of independent notability, references fails the criteria for notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow for clarification from CBG17
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 08:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH; an unremarkable holding company. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.