Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AES – School for Girls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AES – School for Girls

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An organization that fails WP:CORP, with sentential verified evidence of coverage coverage even in a single reliable secondary source. VI-007 (talk) 13:56, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Verified school with a secondary section. We generally keep all secondary schools per long-standing consensus. Appears to actually be called AES School for Girls without the dash. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:54, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Necrothesp: How did you verify? as this page relies on primary references there is not even a single secondary source for verification.--VI-007 (talk) 20:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NSCHOOL. There are multiple secondary sources ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]) verifying that this school exists. --SMS ^Talk 20:40, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - We keep high schools because experience shows that, with enough research, sources can almost invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a poor tool for finding sources on schools in the Indian sub-continent. Very few have much of an Internet presence. We need to avoid systemic bias and allow time for local hard-copy and local language sources to be investigated. The Whispering Wind (talk) 16:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.