Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 13:20, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar to the Americas Group I page, this page is also redundant and is just repeating all the information that has already been created. For numerous years in Fed Cup zonal competition we create a Asia/Europe/Americas Zone main page and then create separate pages for each Pool and the playoffs. This page is just repeating all the information that is already in the separate Pool pages and as well includes numerous mistakes. Keroks (talk) 01:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Given the article sizes, surely it would be better for Wikipedia to keep these pages (and to fix any mistakes of course), and to delete the pool pages instead? The only additonal information I see in the pool pages is a standings table that can be merged upwards. Also, I'd direct the nominator to read WP:OWN. Iffy★Chat -- 11:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 18:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As of now, valid splitting of content (discussions about whether it should be split or not can be resolved on article talk page or on WP project talk with an appropriate RFC, not a rather limiting AfD). One could object on the grounds that's it's an indiscriminate list of match results but WP practice seems to be that this is fine, so I don't see any problem on that front either. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 03:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.