Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006–07 Stevenage Borough F.C. season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2006–07 Stevenage Borough F.C. season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence that these seasons meet the general notability guidelines. Though well referenced, the only sources are run of the mill newspaper sports reporting, which WP:GNG states is not sufficient to establish notability. Beyond this, the page does not show notability as a season. Other AfDs have established a strong consensus that seasons in non fully professional leagues - such as the Conference in which Stevenage competed in 2005/06 - are not inherently notable. Comparable deleted examples are: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 20:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they offer no evidence for meeting the WP:GNG, and cover the same league.

Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 20:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Clear consensus that these fail WP:NSEASONS and we need to have a cut-off somewhere. Number 5 7 08:46, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 15:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all; they all fail WP:GNG as there is no non-routine coverage on these topics. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 02:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 08:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - there is clear consensus that the fifth tier of English football is not sufficiently high to fulfill WP:NSEASONS "top professional leagues" requirement. Fenix down (talk) 09:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.