User talk:Zabezt

August 2024

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Somali Civil War (2009–present), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:25, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just did, you're welcome! Zabezt (talk) 18:54, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only didn't include a source due to the lack of one on the cafe-car bombing incident on July 14th. (Which now that I think about it, I should change that.) Zabezt (talk) 19:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

⇌ Jake Wartenberg 17:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. While it is nice that you disclosed your connection to Special:Contributions/2601:447:C003:9440:24EF:C67:5089:2342/64, please both 1) don't edit war, and 2) ensure you are logged in going forward, even on a headset. Izno (talk) 05:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll remember to log in on any device whenever I want to edit. Zabezt (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Formal warning about edit warring

You broke the 1RR at Somali Civil War. This is a warning that future edit warring will likely lead to a sanction. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar rule violation at Somali Civil War (2009–present). You need to be more careful. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firefangledfeathers, thank you for trying to help, I just want you to know that I am still I new user, I don't know all of the rules, and if I break a rule I most likely didn't know it existed, it wasn't intentional. Right now I'm confused, I want to solve this dispute but Ecrusized doesn't want to discuss with me, what should I do? Zabezt (talk) 11:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:DR, and if you have any questions about one of the options there, let me know. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, a third opinion was already made by @Replayerr on this talk page. So now what? Zabezt (talk) 13:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Either WP:DRN or an WP:RFC. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added an RfC Zabezt (talk) 15:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the RfC doesn't work, can you please persuade Ecrusized to have a discussion with me? Zabezt (talk) 02:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The RfC seems to be in favor of the map currently up, and it doesn't look like anyone else is gonna respond unless they get asked to, so if it's in favor of the current map, what will happen? Zabezt (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfCs typically run for a while, often 30 days. If it's clear what the consensus is at the end of that period, someone can go ahead and implement it. If consensus is not clear, you can request closure from an uninvolved editor, and it'll be clear from their close what the next step should be. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:22, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but what should we do after October 5th when the page protection expires? An edit war or anything similar will probably happen. Zabezt (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agreed with the edit changes. @Ecrusized isn't engaging properly in the talk page. Replayerr (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replayerr, there is an RfC in the Somali Civil War talk page, can you please respond to it? Zabezt (talk) 14:05, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tag me and I'll respond Replayerr (talk) 14:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Union Support and Stabilization Mission in Somalia (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:African Union Support and Stabilization Mission in Somalia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zabezt! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Union Support and Stabilization Mission in Somalia has been accepted

African Union Support and Stabilization Mission in Somalia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 17:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks on the United States

Hey Zabezt! I came across your profile during some of your recent editing in regard to the Syrian conflict. I've been working on a big project over the last few weeks: Attacks on the United States. The aim is to have a list of every time the U.S. (government/military) was attacked, but not when the U.S. was attacking. My hope is to create attacks by the United States once this list is finished.

Well anyway, I wanted to see if you would be interested in helping me put together some of the summaries for the list. I am fairly sure most of the attacks themselves are on the list. But, I'm still working to get the summaries and references put together for each of them. If you are interested or have any questions, feel free to message me back here or on my talk page anytime! If not, I completely understand. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 01:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]