Jump to content

User talk:Yamla/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 15

okay just like to say do you know dominic Monaghan? he's my friend i grew up next door to him we attended Roman Catholic Church together how dare you inform me I cannot put that information about him! what do you have gainst Catholics?


Ninja*Phoebe

Okay, Yamla, I'm sorry for vandalising your page right now, I really really am. I don't know how to leave messages on pages like this, can you please tell me how? Also, I got on my computer and there was a message here on wikipedia for User talk:75.70.142.246. It said I vandalised the Liv Tyler page, which I have no idea about, but I'm sorry about that as well. Please help me, I'm so sorry for vandalising, I'm not joking. I'm so sorry, I just need help.

Ninja*Phoebe

Oh yeah, I also just changed my skin on here to chick, or whatever, and now when I go to "My Prefrences", it won't let me click on "my skin" anymore, like, it's not a link. Please help if you can. Thanks, sorry again.

User: X706030142

Thx for u r unblock:)

Re:Decline Reason

Well, I now know that I am wrong to let people to use my computer to attack wikipedia. I am so sorry. Now I know I am wrong. Please unblock, I am really not that user Louielim. Believe, I can prove if you want. --WJ-WiseJoker 4:18 June 27 2007

User: girlgirl2424

i wuz wondern' if u could xplain how 2 up load picts. Pleaz

Spam?

This user seems to be using wiki for self-advertising. How would you approach this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/38.104.124.14

User: Evil Sheep

I used to go to the school Evil Sheep goes to, which happens to the that of the article which was vandalised. Evil Dog derived his username from Evil Sheep, and presumably his account was still logged in once he came off the computer. I hope you can take what I said into consideration and perhaps think about revoking his block. - Dark Prime

ATL 2

There will be no ATL 2, so you can delete that.

Hi Yamla

Vandal

Hello, no time for an introduction, but User:Tjsynkral keeps blanking his talk page, despite being warned by me, and two other users, he also dropped a message on my page that seems like a threat. Could you please warn him? Brain40 [talk] [contributions]

Apology for posideon comment

Yamla I received your comment and I would like to apologise for this. I was trying to give people a perspective on how studio bosses forecast a movies commercial expectations. Any other comments that I make I will makesure there is 100% truth in what I type. I know your dedication to this site is extroadinary, whatever mistake/s I make I promise you they are not intentional mistakes. Thank you and sorry again.

USER: BRADYBANG

Hello friend, the link I added adds value for a techy but not sure for others who do administrative jobs. In the same section there are other four articles which are now outdated and also having biased informations. I wouls like you to add the same link after an evaluation to appropriate section of the page. I am an unbiased person towards both the languages and has got my fingers burnt by both languages. I am open for a discussion. Since I am a new person I don't know much about the formalities of wiki. I just saw the message be bold to edit in wiki page. Hence I did it. I would appretiate if you could include the same article on behalf of me or guide me to include the same. Thank You Jayaram Ganapathy

Thankssssss:-)

I finnaly understood and I am going to look for photos from tomorrow. I`m so happy we are friends, so happy. Now I understand alll. Thank you so much for your help. you`re the best. And I hope you forgive me for my previous conduct. By the way rhnks for the welcome. Thanks again. PreityFan.

Jackp = RaptorRobot = Angel2001??

Hi Yamla. I think I might have found another User:Jackp and User:RaptorRobot sock. Editing both Sydney and Hollywood articles (including Jack's standard Reese Witherspoon and Kubrick film articles). kind regards --Merbabu 14:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and he's been active on the Template:Toronto landmarks; first swapping it with Sydney's info, then blanking it. Jack sees Toronto and Sydney as rivals, and he has often made the opposite change to a Toronto page than he does for Sydney. Merbabu 14:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Best to pass this one along to WP:CHECK, I think. --Yamla 14:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, User:213.113.231.249 is requesting an unblock. The IP is being block by the block of 213.113.231.0/24 till 15:18, 24 April 2008 with the reason "Used abusively by banned sockpuppeteer, Verdict. Do not unblock without consulting blocking admin."

I am going to let you handle this one, I have told the IP that I have contacted you. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 15:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I will look into it. --Yamla 15:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Your quick. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 15:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Waiting on my database to finish its conversion.  :) --Yamla 15:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Question

I dont know what I did wrong or what was vandalism. I just put Donald trump as Lashley's manager because of WM23.

Superbowl controversy

I have a hard time understanding how I vandalized the controversy related to the Justin Timberlake/Janet Jackson article. I corrected the wrong and misleading information that was presented. The article mentioned that because Jackson was wearing a nipple ring ("nipple shield" as it states") that it somehow cause suspicion on the so-called accident. That is irrelevant and highly unjustifiable to make mention of. Lastly, I edited the part where it was written that "also, Janet took her time to cover up," That is NOT true. In the original airing, the commercials cut right after the 2 seconds her breast was exposed anyhow, so who is anyone to judge and make assumptions? Further more, there are plenty of still images that show Jackson cover herself up with people handing her a towel meanwhile Timberlake is just standing there. In his own words on Entertainment Tonight, he does mention that [they] were doing that. And that is why I edited those two lines. Its not "vandalism" it is correction.

-P4poetic

please unblock lazio_gio

Sorry Yamla if I did not provide a reason within the required parameters, but if you look at my page I have provided numerous reasons for unblocking (namely I am not Vince B) Please just compare the edits. Thank you

Hi Yamla - I appreciate your response regarding best practices for external links. The site I tried to add as an external link is a site which contributes to the college cheerleading community. Can you help me understand if it is innappropriate for it to be included as an external link, or is it the goal of the page to only define what constitutes cheerleading?

Please do understand that the link was added in good faith and not intended to bilk the system.

Thanks for your time.

New user

I'm not sure what BlueShrek is asking what I should do. Can you assist him? Also, check out his userpage; I'm not one to judge, but it seems suspicious that a new user is familiar with several userboxes at such an early start. Lord Sesshomaru

GourmetAnarchy

He's not a sockpuppet. I'm the user you thought he was a sockpuppet of, and I've actually shut down my own account as best I can. GourmetAnarchy's explanation of what happened was 100% accurate, there are dozens of users on TotalFark who could verify his story. I have no idea if he even wants to use wikipedia any longer, but please consider taking this stain off his record, it is entirely undeserved.

Smile

YOU ARE AWESOME!

If you read the description, it is clearly stated that no free alternative could be found. When no free alternative can be found, the fair use can be applied. If you think that there is one, please find it and replace the image. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Jo9100 02:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

That is not the case. For living subjects, we assume a freely-licensed image could be created. Please see WP:FU. --Yamla 03:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

RE: Vandalize Wikipedia

Re: If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Naomi Watts, you will be blocked from editing.

Look, i read the Yahoo!News and get to know the fictional character Narcissa Black is going to portrayed by Naomi Watts. I'm actually a newbie here, and I feel really uncomfortable about the word "Vandalize", so just check the news yourself. That's all.

The "news" was refuted by her agent long before you added it to the article. Please see WP:RS to understand why we require reliable sources. --Yamla 16:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Lord Sinestro

I've been looking into this more and more, this Lord Sinestro (talk · contribs · logs) account was made a day after McBane420's block and the user (like BlueShrek) does make identical edits to comic-related pages and DBZ. I was alerted by sysop Kafziel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) to report suspicious looking accounts and this one appears to fit that criteria; he edit wars, changes / removes the dates and refs of pages[1]; he edits wrestling articles and leaves uncivil remarks and signs off like BlueShrek[2] and TheManWhoLaughs[3] did, see Lord Sinestro's. Does this behaviour issue an infinite block or just CheckUser? Lord Sesshomaru

Looks fairly straight-forward, I will block indefinitely. --Yamla 17:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. Lord Sesshomaru
User:Lord_Sinestro is requesting an unblock. I earlier today unblocking wrestlinglover420 who asked nicley to be unblocked and promised to behave. I posted a thread at ANI that showed a consensus to give him a second chance. I have reviewed the edits of Lord_Sinestro and cannot find a common link to wrestling lover? Can you think of a reason Lord_Sinestro should not be unblocked? If you have substantial evidence that it indeed a sock of wrestlinglover420, i would like to pursue a checkuser to clear this up. Thanks in advance. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Hhhhmmm. I don't really have much to add apart from the comments left by Lord Sesshomaru on ANI and the comments left by jpgordon (who has checkuser access) on your talk page. --Yamla 22:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

You may delete it

Hi. You may delete the image you mentioned in my talk page. The explanation there is in the text itself, you may change the tag or delete the image. One screenshot is PERMITTED by the wiki's rules, but I won't write anymore explanations over there. Have a good day. Danny-w 18:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

There was no detailed fair-use rationale for that image. There was only the source and license text. See WP:FURG for more information. Although you claim that one screenshot is permitted by wikipedia's rules, we do require that a detailed fair-use rationale be provided explaining how the screenshot is being used to provide critical commentary. --Yamla 20:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Chrislk02

Do you think you could convince him to reconsider his unblocking of Wrestlinglover420? I agree that it may stop him from creating socks yet I disagree that he so much as deserves a fair unblock after what we had to put with. I'm not a sysop so its best to let you decide. If you can, comment here and here. My regards, Lord Sesshomaru

Nah, I'll let the unblock stand uncontested. He's a good admin and I'm sure will monitor the contributions for further abuse. It's easy enough to reblock if necessary and any further abuse would give grounds for a community ban. --Yamla 23:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Very well. Lord Sesshomaru

User: Candicesfan

As per current discussion on WP:ANI, a user who has been blocked with 3 different usernames this week also claims to be User:Candicesfan. This editor was blocked by you on 15 April [4] for sockpuppetry. Do you recall the other user names involved, or was it IP abuse? Thanks, ELIMINATORJR TALK 00:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)


Why did you remove the image? It has no copyright symbol, and it is from Renegade Squadron. SG-17 14:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

The lack of a copyright symbol does not prevent the image from being protected by copyright law. That image is missing the source and detailed fair-use rationale and so is in blatant violation of WP:FU. --Yamla 15:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your prompt help in getting me out from under the blocked shared IP. Best, Baccyak4H (Yak!) 15:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


Regarding an IP

Regarding User:203.87.127.18, who you just rejected his unblock request. On his talk page he threatens to vandalize wikipedia on several other IP's. What would be the best solution for this? DbishopNWF 15:47, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

There's really not much we can do. I mean, revert the vandalism where it occurs and if the vandalism is all from the same address range, we could block that. But for the moment, there's not much to do. --Yamla 15:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
K, thanks for the quick response. DbishopNWF 17:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Anna Paquin Piano monologue.jpg

Hi, you marked the above image as not having a fair use rationale. It does have one, but I suppose you don't agree with it. Could you be more specific how the rationale should be written? Moorvis 19:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeap! See WP:FURG!  :) --Yamla 19:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

User:Prin possibly back again

Back in March you handled a situation with a sockpuppet of Prin, Prince Godfather (talk · contribs). This was the report filed. [5]

I strongly suspect he is back as Universal Hero (talk · contribs). Lots of circumstantial evidence lead me to check the uploaded images. This one Image:AVMstudios.jpg appears to be a blatant copyvio from this source [6]. I will warn the user but will be away from wikipedia for a while so will not be able to handle any procedure that takes a more than a few days. GameKeeper 21:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Best thing to do is to file a checkuser request, I think. If you do, let me know and I will monitor it. --Yamla 22:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response. I have filed a suspected sock puppet case here Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Universal Hero. GameKeeper 22:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Mediation

Yamla, I need your help with a dispute. User:Thedeadmanandphenom has taken a concern I informed him about out of context and is reporting me for vandalism. Can you please help mediate this dispute? I never made any personal attacks towards him. All I did was removed their "personal attack" warnings as they were uncalled for and untrue. Thank you for your time. - Deep Shadow 15:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind. I think the matter has been resolved for the time being. Thanks anyway. - Deep Shadow 15:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
No problem. Let me know if you need my help in the future. --Yamla 15:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)