User talk:Wortulo

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Christian Busch (management scientist). Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) Arjayay (talk) 08:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay: Thanks, this was my error during copy - paste, now the correct link to CV is there.--Wortulo (talk) 09:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from de:Christian_Busch_(Wirtschaftswissenschaftler) to Christian Busch (management scientist). While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces: Thanks, I have seen the problem also of course. But I am the author of both German and English article of Christian Busch and the 2 articles are different. I had in Version 08-23-2024 the remark:

I am the author in German Wikipedia of Christian Busch (Wirtschaftswissenschaftler). Starting version is from [1]

Later I had on article the translation message {{translated page|de|Christian Busch (Wirtschaftswissenschaftler)|version=247941879}}. Wortulo (talk) 16:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added this box again. Is this OK? I am familiar with German WP, it's my first article in English. Wortulo (talk) 17:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A BOT transferred it to talk page of this article, seems to be now at the correct place :-) Wortulo (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just take note of the above, that you have to follow the format of attribution. I don’t think it’s matters whether you’re the sole author of the German one or not, as long as you’re translating from a local-language Wikipedia TO English-language Wikipedia, then you have to follow this process. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will use the box from the beginning next time. What status has this box? Used 97'000 times and exactly recommended for this purpose! [2]

I copied it also from an official page. You can find the exact German original version there - instead of looking for date and time in your proposal. Wortulo (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevertheless I have added your proposal in Version History.@Vanderwaalforces: Wortulo (talk) 19:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Class=C?

@Rfl0216: Allow me to ask you here regarding this Classification C of page Christian Busch (management scientist). I apologize at first, that I am not so familiar with biographies in en:WP. My home is de:WP, where I try to write in biographies more than in a CV, this with success. I respect the "cultural differences" and I want to learn. The English article is already shorter than my German version (I also was author and this was a hint). The system of classification is not bad (we do not have). But when I read the description of C it is not clear, if something is missing or too much. I want to improve this article. Can you give some hints, why only C? I thank you in advance Wortulo (talk) 16:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

protocol: unfortunately no answer, also at his disc. Changed it without comment to B. Wortulo (talk) 16:48, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime

News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation shares ANI lawsuit updates; first admin elections appoint eleven sysops; first admin recalls opened; temporary accounts coming soon?

In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel

Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship

Gallery: Why you should take more photos and upload them

In focus: Questions and answers about the court case

Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?

Technology report: Wikimedia tech, the Asian News International case, and the ultra-rare BLACKLOCK

Humour: Man quietly slinks away from talk page argument after realizing his argument dumb, wrong

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for your next article in English

How about an English version of de:Kristina Adorjan?--Ipigott (talk) 11:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, she is a candidate :-) Thx. Wortulo (talk) 12:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

News and notes: Open letter to WMF about court case breaks one thousand signatures, big arb case declined, U4C begins accepting cases

In the media: Summons issued for Wikipedia editors by Indian court, "Gaza genocide" RfC close in news, old admin Gwern now big AI guy, and a "spectrum of reluctance" over Australian place names

Recent research: SPINACH: AI help for asking Wikidata "challenging real-world questions"

News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Endowment audit reports: FY 2023–2024

Traffic report: Well, let us share with you our knowledge, about the electoral college

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]