User talk:TheThingy

Please help with usability testing

Hello! The mw:Anti-Harassment Tools team is running a usability test to find out how and where IP addresses are used when patrolling wikis, particularly when patrolling RecentChanges. This could include New Pages or RecentChanges patrol. We want to see your patrolling process and get your views on some prototypes. Getting your perspective would be really helpful to us at this stage of the process. If you’d like to help, and have 30 minutes to spare, please fill out this Google form with your details: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfjYyRNGMkO4_TdNOgG4qmK9cp9YOKzM4GFO5pTd_bEcu23YQ/viewform

For the purpose of the tests we’ll be using Google Forms for recruitment, and UserTesting.com to conduct the actual tests. Please review the privacy statement and release form in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ijmwrIoNO0W1p_zfFU1LBf3_6mFF53kUUFy1L_DCUKc (Google docs link)

Thank you,

NKohli (WMF) (talk) and PSaxena (WMF) (talk) 03:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plumber troll/vandal

Please read Wikipedia:Deny recognition. It is not helpful to tell a troll that their vandalism "adds excitement" to an article. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:04, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When people blank warnings

Hi there. I understand the desire to revert when people blank warnings on their User Talk pages but they are allowed to do this and it is actually for the good when they do this. You see, by blanking the warnings this proves that they have seen them and, far from hiding their misbehaviour, it just serves to prove that any subsequent disruptive behaviour is knowing and intentional. The final warning still stands. If you catch them doing any more vandalism then you can take it straight to ARV. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, understood. TheThingy ^Talk 22:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page says you're a guy.

If that's in fact true then you are probably biased against the truth about guys which makes what you think an opinion as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.136.73.175 (talk) 18:38, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Axolotls

Template:WikiProject Axolotls has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"GoldenEye 007 (1997 video game" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect GoldenEye 007 (1997 video game has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § GoldenEye 007 (1997 video game until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Redirects from gender has been nominated for renaming

Category:Redirects from gender has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 09:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]