User talk:Roman Frankiv

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Roman Frankiv! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Marek.69^talk 15:04, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rus' people, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:Rus' people and User talk:Iryna Harpy were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Rus' people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Rus' people. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for repeatedly adding a totally unsourced WP:OR map to the article, in spite of being told why it doesn't belong there. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 07:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Ruthenian Voivodeship

Hello. I have reverted your edit since you can not make an edit changing the text in the article to say that the original inhabitants of the area were Slavs, without providing a reliable source for it! - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 09:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And stop adding that darned map all over the place, even adding it twice or more on the same pages. We've already seen it, and replied to it, so there's no need to add it anywhere anymore! - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 19:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And please stop adding more WP:OR as you've done here. Unless you have reliable sources to back up Zakerzonia as fully covering the exact location discussed in the article, it's WP:SYNTH (i.e., a conflation by you about prehistoric times). You are not helping to inform the reader, but to mislead the reader. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

POV edits

Hello again. Please stop making anachronistic name changes in articles, such as changing Lwów to Lviv in the article about the Ruthenian Voivodeship. During the time period discussed in the article, 1434-1772, the name of the city was Lwów not Lviv (and after that it was named Lemberg, and didn't become Lviv until after World War II). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 22:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rus' people. Jim1138 (talk) 08:07, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DE - Disruptive editing

Wikipedia is a community effort. You can't just go in and remove sourced info, and revert multiple times in a WP:BATTLEGROUND way. Your editing is disruptive, and as such, you have been blocked one week. Feel free to visit WP:GAB. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 17:43, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Szczuczyn pogrom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Szczuczyn pogrom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Szczuczyn pogrom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Roman Frankiv. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 03:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your nationalist editing pattern has been going on for many years now. Graham87 03:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]