User talk:Retired user 0001/Archives/2010/September
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Retired user 0001. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Now that the name is settled and the bot is flagged, you might want to update Template:QOTD/doc to indicate which bot is handling it now and to remove obsolete information about {{QuoteText}} and {{QuoteAuthor}}. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:55, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Just out of interest
Regarding AFC clerk bots's move of Malani Gola Mwanza Junior? What was that about? Polargeo (talk) 14:54, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry I've got it, silly me. Good bot! Polargeo (talk) 14:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Spam
Dear Reviewer,
DataPilot has coined the “cell phone backup”, “cell phone sync” and “cell phone software” terms in the market (a search on the Internet would bring DataPilot in top results – first as commercial software). There are 1.5M active users of DataPilot, and it is being ranked by NPD as top selling productivity software in US for years in a raw. Our intention is to let users know that besides manufacturer specific software titles, there is a software solution that will be phone agnostic and allow them to map the data from a Motorola to a Samsung for instance. Database structure is different and work is very humongous to have all these phone supported. In this regard, DataPilot is the only software to cover most of the phones to enable this seamless migration from one phone to the next.
In a nutshell, we believe that the proposed solution is unique and grasp sufficient consumer interest to qualify it as an article on your prestigiuos site.
Thank You.
- You thought that PR on my talk page would work? Pweh. God, it looks more like an ad. —I-20the highway 17:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:37, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
AfC clerk bot
Mandel Robert was not tagged for CSD G6 or R2; we don't want cross-namespace redirects, so please have the bot CSD the pages before continuing or someone will need to manually go through the contribs and delete them. Thanks, —fetch·comms 21:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- I eventually plan on suppressing redirects one the bot gets a flag. —I-20the highway 21:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- I wrote some sloppy code to tag afterwards. —I-20the highway 21:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I realize this is just a temporary measure, but I wasn't sure how many redirects would be created during the trial for admins to find and then delete. —fetch·comms 22:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ok. Thanks! —I-20the highway 22:02, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, I just approved a submission, and the bot moved it back. Could there be a longer waiting time, if it's not possible to stop the bot moving submissions over redirects? Thanks. sonia♫ 10:35, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- It runs every hour, and I'm very sorry about that. It will make mistakes every now and then. —I-20the highway 21:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, I know it's legal to move over redirects, I was just wondering if there was a way for it to detect that and not do it. Cheers anyway- it works fine for the most part. sonia♫ 22:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have fixed this. —I-20the highway 22:22, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps there might be a way to add in a five-minute delay so that the bot doesn't move any article within five minutes of its creation? That would remove most cases of conflict like this. Grutness...wha? 22:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- What he's done by stopping it moving over redirects is probably more efficient, imo. sonia♫ 23:07, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps there might be a way to add in a five-minute delay so that the bot doesn't move any article within five minutes of its creation? That would remove most cases of conflict like this. Grutness...wha? 22:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have fixed this. —I-20the highway 22:22, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, I know it's legal to move over redirects, I was just wondering if there was a way for it to detect that and not do it. Cheers anyway- it works fine for the most part. sonia♫ 22:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- It runs every hour, and I'm very sorry about that. It will make mistakes every now and then. —I-20the highway 21:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, I just approved a submission, and the bot moved it back. Could there be a longer waiting time, if it's not possible to stop the bot moving submissions over redirects? Thanks. sonia♫ 10:35, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ok. Thanks! —I-20the highway 22:02, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I realize this is just a temporary measure, but I wasn't sure how many redirects would be created during the trial for admins to find and then delete. —fetch·comms 22:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- I wrote some sloppy code to tag afterwards. —I-20the highway 21:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 September 2010
- News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes
- Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment
- Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration
- WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab
- Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Tagging redirects for deletion
When your bot tags a redirect for deletion, please leave the redirect there - just prepend the speedy deletion tag, on a separate line. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- pywikipedia throws a fit when a pg3.get(), but I'll see. —I-20the highway 13:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 September 2010
- From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost
- News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
- In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
- Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC)