User talk:Qualiesin

Qualiesin, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Qualiesin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Pachycoris) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Pachycoris.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I've linked to the entry on Wikidata, in the process linking to articles in other languages and the Wikimedia Commons category. I've added a reference list and a tag on the talk page, and a taxonbar at the bottom (which linking to Wikidata populates with links). The claim that the taxon was first described in 1843 needs to be sourced, and some information on geographical distribution would be nice.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Blythwood (talk) 21:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hinde Bergner has been accepted

Hinde Bergner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 09:37, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Qualiesin! You created a thread called Please Help at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Nice article about a palm tree species! Hope this goat won't chew it up too much.

— Stevey7788 (talk) 21:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sapri Sale (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sapri Sale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sapri Sale, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nefesh Mountain has been accepted

Nefesh Mountain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sibú

Hello and thanks for the great article on Sibú. I'm wondering about the spelling of his name, in this version it says both that the Cabécar spelling is Sibö and Sibú, I left the latter spelling in, but maybe you could check that I didn't remove the right spelling? The article also uses Sibú and Sibö interchangebly, would it be okay to switch them all to Sibú?

If you have any more such well-made articles that have been lingering in draftspace for months, you can of course move them to article-space yourself, you don't have to wait for review. I see that this article was made over 4 months ago, which is of course way too long to wait for a review.

Regards, – Thjarkur (talk) 21:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Russell (American singer) has been accepted

Anthony Russell (American singer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sapri Sale concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sapri Sale, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sapri Sale

Hello, Qualiesin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sapri Sale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 14:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Living dinosaur and Category:Cryptozoology

Hello, I see you've reverted the change of Category:Cryptids to Category:Cryptozoology on several articles. The problem with using Category:Cryptid for entities from the folklore record or for supposed sightings of this or that, is that it places the pseudoscientific/fringe term "cryptid" in Wikipedia voice, rather than noting that the entity is of particualr interest to the subculture and pseudoscience—and there are really only a handful of these out there that are of any particular notability to the subculture.

Not long ago, Wikipedia suffered from members of the subculture building a sort of cryptozoology compendoum out of the site, very much in violation of WP:PROFRINGE and WP:PSEUDOSCIENCE. The cleanup of those efforts continues, but there's still a big mess to be mopped up. A major issue is ensuring that these entries are as etic as possible, removing pseudoscience-internal vocabulary unless it's directly relevant and clearly a quote, for example. :bloodofox: (talk) 05:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tahquitz (disambiguation)

Since you have previously updated a related article, you might be interested in knowing there is a discussion regarding the Tahquitz (disambiguation) page. The discussion is at Talk:Tahquitz (disambiguation). OvertAnalyzer (talk) 16:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding those categories to the LGBTQ list pages

I'll have to add that to some other pages. There's also "Category:Japanese LGBT-related television shows" for anime like Adachi and Shimamura, Otherside Picnic, and Cherry Magic! Thirty Years of Virginity Can Make You a Wizard?!. As soon as DeadEndia and S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters begin, then it would make sense to add it to Category:2020s LGBT-related television series. --Historyday01 (talk) 23:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Blau

"Linguist of Afroasiatic languages" describes what he did much better than "Arabist" (a vague and sometimes derogatory term). AnonMoos (talk) 07:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, he primarily researched Arabic, and occasionally other Semitic languages. "Afroasiatic" is far too broad a category for him. If "Arabist" is too vague a term, take it up with the people who made Category:Linguists of Arabic redirect to Category:Arabists. --Qualiesin (talk) 15:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He published on non-Arabic Semitic languages far more than "occasionally", and was an expert in the historical linguistics of Hebrew. Of course I agree that he didn't study non-Semitic Afroasiatic languages, but "Arabist" is far too narrow to encompass his interests (not to mention faintly redolent of pith-helmeted colonialists romanticizing desert bedouins, something which has extremely little relevance to Joahua Blau's works). AnonMoos (talk) 19:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red link categories

Hello, Qualiesin,

Please do not add nonexistent, red link categories to pages. See WP:REDNO for details. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cowboy Bebop character redirects to lists has been nominated for merging

Category:Cowboy Bebop character redirects to lists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More than a typo

Hello, Qualiesin, Please don't remove a large portion of content from a page, as you did on the History of LGBT characters in animation: 2020s and describe it as a "typo." Dead Endia has been renamed, Arcane deserves to be on the page, whether you like the series or not, as does Q-Force, despite the fact the latter series is deeply problematic. The Bubble Blabber link should stay as well, its Taneka Stotts not Taneka Scotts, and the stuff about The Ghost and Molly McGee should also stay as well. --Historyday01 (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly have no idea how that happened. I was only fixing a typo, I had no intention to delete large chunks of the article. Thanks for catching the error. Qualiesin (talk) 02:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Schlemiel category

Are you sure you are in for Judaism? Then you must know the difference: it is Shlimazl who is unlucky. Shlemiel is an inept one, which has nothing to do with luck, but with inability to do things well. Loew Galitz (talk) 23:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully disagree, despite your implication that I don't know my own culture. Qualiesin (talk) 19:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After some thought, it appears you are right: the ineptness of a shlemiel often brings him bad luck. The article must be expanded. I restored the category. Cheers Loew Galitz (talk) 20:40, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pi Alpha Tau

Pi Alpha Tau is not the only (Historically) Jewish Sorority, you may want to look at the rest at List_of_Jewish_fraternities_and_sororities#Social_sororities.Naraht (talk) 22:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Template:Rǫgnvaldr-name, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 09:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Reinaldo (given name)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Reinaldo (given name) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 8 § Reinaldo (given name) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The Banner talk 19:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

short description is misplaced

short description must be updated on top of article. see layout. visually it does not change anything, however it plays an important role in search results. your edit, short description is not on top of article. placement info Wikipedia:Short_description#Placement. thank u. <_> jindam, vani (talk) 03:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Holawaka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holawaka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holawaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:07, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Miri Rubin

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Miri Rubin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hi! I was editing the lead section of Passover and I noticed you changed Ḥag hapPesaḥ to Ḥag haPesaḥ in this edit and I'm not sure why since I know very little about Hebrew, though I assume it's not relevant to the change I was making. Please make sure to always put an edit summary — even a sentence or two is better than nothing. To help yourself remember, you may want to turn on "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" in your preferences. Thanks! For comparison, this later edit on the same area of the article has a very helpful edit summary. — W.andrea (talk) 18:14, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Humor in science

Hello, Qualiesin,

Category redirects are created differently than article redirects. Please look at the code on this page so you know how to create category redirects should you wish to make another one in the future. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:47, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changing section redirects to less specific sections

Hi, I was wondering why you made these two (and possibly other similar) edits?: edit to Ty Lee redirect, edit to Mai redirect

I was going to edit those two redirects to link to the specific characters in question (via the anchors installed for each character on that page), until I happened to think to check the edit history first, and was surprised & confused to see your edits undoing what had previously been more specific sections.

To me, it seems obvious that redirects to sections should go to the most specific relevant section possible, as to help readers find the information they are trying to find as quickly & easily as possible, but perhaps there is some MOS guideline or other reason to not do that I am unaware of? (i still have yet to fully read read the MOS as it is very long & tiring)

Since your edit descriptions didn't specify the reason for the change, I have resorted to asking you the rationale behind them so that I might understand better and possibly improve my edits to Wikipedia.

Thanks! Regards, 99.146.242.37 (talk) 09:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Ulanji, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 12:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Please respond to this discussion Talk:From the river to the sea#Category dispute where you have been pinged. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]