User talk:Quad entendre

Your links in student loan related articles

Hi. I noticed that you seem to be creating articles on student loans by removing the text from the large Student loan article and creating ones for Australia and Canada so far. Why are you doing this? Also, why are you putting in spam links into the shorter articles? Your links appear to almost look like references. Why are you doing this? --EarthPerson 01:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EarthPerson: I am disambiguating Student loan, as was suggested on Student loandiscussion page and as noted in my changes to Student loan and to the Student loans in Canada. The text is copied. The links were already there, which speaks to the reason for disambiguating Student loan. It is so long and 'crosses so many jurisdictional lines' that it discourages serious review. Thx for removing the spam links. I will be review for these in the future country pages.

Hi. I see that it was suggested, but there was only one reply that favored it. That's not much of a consensus. Still, it does seem like a good way to get it more manageable. Now, I want to formally apologize for thinking that you put in the spam links. I see from the previous versions of Student loan that the links were indeed there. I first saw this when you created the Student loans in Australia article and I didn't know where it was from. Sorry about that. Keep up the good work and be bold. --EarthPerson 01:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Logo salliemae.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo salliemae.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sallie Mae logo 2009.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sallie Mae logo 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Student loans in Ireland

The article Student loans in Ireland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:OR and maybe WP:SYNTH too. 10+ years unsupported… Short uncited piece with no base - there is no systemic student loan scheme in Ireland, at least as yet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SeoR (talk) 18:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]