User talk:QARon
|
The article Cantata++ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not meet notability guidelines.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:30, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cantata++ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantata++ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
j⚛e deckertalk 01:38, 2 July 2014 (UTC)The article Cantata++ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Newly created article that does not in any way meet notability. Why would user:Joe Decker move a subject that fails notability and the article has not had any RS that support its notability added since it failed its AfD: [[:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantata++
From Wikipedia]]?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cantata++ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantata++ (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 01:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 07:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Fiddle Faddle 07:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cantata++ may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- be tested, which when compiled are parsed with a built-in a parser from [[EDG|Edison Design Group)]].
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 19:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Fiddle Faddle 19:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Wise
[edit]May I suggest you let the deletion discussion run its course, pretty much as you are doing, with one exception. Do not be drawn into battles, something you have resisted so far. You were very restrained with the gentleman I have dropped a big hint to. You are, should you choose, entitled to complain about him, but I suggest ignoring him is the more effective route. Fiddle Faddle 21:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your advice. I'm going to ignore him in future. But I was very patient with him for a long time and this comment was too much. I'm really asking myself if it is something personal or his personal interest to delete the article. And that won't meet the Wiki Guidance in no way... Nevertheless, I'll follow your advice and will restrain myself :-) ! Thank you very much. Greets, QARon (talk) 21:50, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- His behaviour makes it appear personal, but I am sure he is simply expressing his frustration about the article's existence, though not in the best manner. As you know, I doubt you can find enough material for verification of any notability, but I want you to have a fair chance to make the attempt. I hope to encourage you to become a hobbyist editor here. Fiddle Faddle 22:26, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
As I hoped, the discussion has returned the article to Draft:Cantata++. I was going to say "Good luck with finding references" but that sounded sarcastic! Fiddle Faddle 07:46, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Haha, no it doesn't sound sarcastic when you're saying it! Thank you, I'll do my best! May you assist me if I will have some questions during my work on it ? I would feel in good hands, having you "besides me" as a professional editor ;-) QARon (talk) 17:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ask me on my talk page or use {{ping}} and I'll answer whatever I can. May I suggest you don't submit for review until you've exhausted all possible reference sources. Fiddle Faddle 20:15, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
A thought for the review might be to invite that strong opponent of the article to review it or to comment on it. They will if it is accepted, so it is better to do that thing early, I suspect. Fiddle Faddle 16:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
You think I should inform the strong opponent (Walter Görlitz) first ? Really ?
- I am working on the 'can't lose by taking the bull by the horns' theory. He is going to have an opinion sooner or later. Getting him out of the way up front may be a useful set of further comments on the draft. No-one can be sure how other wikipedians react. Fiddle Faddle 16:56, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cantata++ (October 6)
[edit]
The article is still enormously too detailed; WP is an encyclopedia, not a software manual.
You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cantata++ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! QARon,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 00:19, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by MadScientistX11 (talk) 13:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cantata++ has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
LorTalk 07:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cantata++ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantata++ (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Repeat AfD nominee
[edit]You previously voiced an opinion on an AfD discussion on an article. It was subsequently moved to user space and made it to main space. It has been nominated for deletion again: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantata++ (3rd nomination). If you are interested in weighing-in, it would be helpful to know if you see any improvement in the article and it currently meets WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantata++ (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.