User talk:MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gaetano Giordani

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gaetano Giordani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George Tripp for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Tripp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Tripp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ingratis (talk) 08:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ephraim Gottlieb Krüger

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from de.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 06:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich August Schmidt (lexicographer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Friedrich August Schmidt (lexicographer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aldobrandini Collection moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aldobrandini Collection. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Partially completed, poorly formatted and sourced, not ready for mainspace. Please finish the article including inline sources before moving back to article space, or merge with Aldobrandini family article.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Netherzone (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kaspar Friedrich Lossius moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kaspar Friedrich Lossius. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is a poor translation and not footnoted. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ingratis (talk) 05:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Conversation (painting)

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Conversation (painting), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Numismatic museums in the Americas has been nominated for merging

Category:Numismatic museums in the Americas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brought back a draft article of yours

Hello. I asked for a return of Draft:House in the Garden (House and Trees), the 1908 Pablo Picasso cubist painting, and added a bit to it (source and descriptor). Maybe take a look and check if you'd like to expand the article, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 08:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Narbonne Archaeological Museum moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Narbonne Archaeological Museum. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Amalvi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Christian Amalvi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ingratis (talk) 23:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete and unattributed translations

I should perhaps mention that there is no point submitting badly unfinished translations from other Wikipedias, such as (one among many) Christian Amalvi, as they will just be draftified or even deleted. If you submit completed translations, such as Germaine Veyret-Verner, for which many thanks, you should please attribute them as per WP:TFOLWP for copyright reasons. Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 23:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaetano Giordani (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Uncited. Questionable notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaetano Giordani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television depictions of the Metropolitan Police

A tag has been placed on Category:Television depictions of the Metropolitan Police indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Ingleton has been nominated for discussion

Category:People from Ingleton has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Keith D (talk) 22:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Conversation (painting)

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Conversation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 03:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Namibian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Namibian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Angolan prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Angolan prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bosnian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Bosnian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bulgarian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Bulgarian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Iranian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Iranian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Canadian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chilean prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Chilean prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cypriot prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Cypriot prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jordanian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Jordanian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hungarian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Hungarian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:New Zealand prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:New Zealand prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Portuguese prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Portuguese prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Slovenian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Slovenian prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Turkish prehistorians has been nominated for splitting

Category:Turkish prehistorians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Met Headquarters

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Met Headquarters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of MPs for Colchester, 1885–1983 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of MPs for Colchester, 1885–1983 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MPs for Colchester, 1885–1983 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Lewisham

A tag has been placed on Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Lewisham indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Harrow

A tag has been placed on Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Harrow indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham

A tag has been placed on Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Sutton

A tag has been placed on Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Sutton indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Redbridge

A tag has been placed on Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Redbridge indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Merton

A tag has been placed on Category:Grade II listed churches in the London Borough of Merton indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner,

I can't tell from your edit summaries, are you asking for these categories to be deleted? Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. Thank you for your work on Metropolitan Police Staff (Superannuation) Act 1875. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paintings of figures from the Deuteronomistic history

Category:Paintings of figures from the Deuteronomistic history has been nominated for merging. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 3#Category:Paintings of figures from the Deuteronomistic history. – Fayenatic London 20:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise Category:Paintings of Hebrew Bible people by book, discussed just above that one. – Fayenatic London 20:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trees in L'Estaque

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hilst, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Trees in L'Estaque, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hilst}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– Hilst [talk] 00:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Amalvi (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jeromeenriquez were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christian Amalvi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 16:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An odd decision imo, as I've said on his talk. Johnbod (talk) 04:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. Thank you for your work on Schloss by the Water. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paintings of the Sacrifice of Isaac has been nominated for merging

Category:Paintings of the Sacrifice of Isaac has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edward Parker (police officer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward Parker (police officer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Parker (police officer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Welcome to Pandora (talk) 09:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Friedrich August Schmidt (lexicographer)

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Friedrich August Schmidt (lexicographer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Police Magistrates Metropolitan Act 1822

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Police Magistrates Metropolitan Act 1822, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aldobrandini Collection

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aldobrandini Collection, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kaspar Friedrich Lossius

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kaspar Friedrich Lossius, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:House in the Garden (House and Trees)

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:House in the Garden (House and Trees), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Narbonne Archaeological Museum

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Narbonne Archaeological Museum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ham II (talk) 07:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Police Magistrates Metropolitan Act 1822

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Police Magistrates Metropolitan Act 1822".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aldobrandini Collection

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Aldobrandini Collection".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kaspar Friedrich Lossius

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kaspar Friedrich Lossius".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Former Enemy Aliens (Disabilities Removal) Act 1925 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Former Enemy Aliens (Disabilities Removal) Act 1925. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gaetano Giordani

Hello, MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gaetano Giordani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Paintings of snakes

A tag has been placed on Category:Paintings of snakes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eliezer and Rebecca moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Eliezer and Rebecca. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:43, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Judgement of Solomon (Poussin)

Hello, fellow Wikipedian!

I would first like to begin by thanking you for the ongoing translation of Poussin's Judgment of Solomon. I am the main creator of the French article, and I gotta say, it creates a funny feeling in me to see my work being translated in another language. So thank you for that.

I also wanted to share with you a glaring mistake I've made. What I thought was the third study of the Judgment is in fact just a near-contemporary copy of the work, hence why it looks very similar to the painting. I will ask to change the title on Commons, and will eventually move this artwork down in the "Drawings" section of the article. Here is a source.

Last thing I wanted to share with you is that I am presently reworking the entirety of the "Composition" section. As you may have noticed, it is essentially a mish-mash of various quotes from different authors, and it feels sketchy. My friendly advice would be to wait until I've finished with that section before translating it, or, if you feel like, create your own - we are all free to contribute as we see fit, after all. The other sections I feel are pretty much solid. I'll also rework them eventually (I'm of course planning to obtain a lil golden star for my work), but it'll be mostly cosmetic in nature - rearrange some references here and there, that sort of thing.

Thanks again for the work you're doing - it truly is a masterpiece, isn't it? ;)

Many cordialities, Witcher of Izalith 23:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Rowan (high sheriff) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Rowan (high sheriff) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Rowan (high sheriff) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eliezer and Rebecca has been accepted

Eliezer and Rebecca, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 00:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British patrolwomen has been nominated for merging

Category:British patrolwomen has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi MaybeItsBecauseImALondoner. Thank you for your work on Eliezer and Rebecca. Another editor, Tavantius, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for making a disambiguation page on Wikipedia! Have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tavantius}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tavantius (talk) 21:22, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Metropolitan Police accommodation buildings

A tag has been placed on Category:Metropolitan Police accommodation buildings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 11:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Metropolitan Police administrative buildings

A tag has been placed on Category:Metropolitan Police administrative buildings indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 11:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]