User talk:Mancionel/sandbox

BIG SUR I thought that this was really well done. Your citations were perfect and the cites were credible.Gzaf21 (talk) 15:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the amenities section, I would add more information if you can find any. Gzaf21 (talk) 15:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, this is really good work and will help the page to present the best possible information to Wikipedia users. Gzaf21 (talk) 15:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review (English 1102-053)

All of the links in the "General Information" paragraph work perfectly like there wasn't any error message or messages saying "This page no longer exists." However, try to put in more information about this park because someone like me who doesn't know anything about this specific park could learn a thing or two from reading this Wikipedia article. Everything looks good, nice organization and I love it how you label your paragraphs. Also, I didn't see any grammar or spelling errors in your rough draft and good citations. PhilipRK101 (talk) 15:31, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]